<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persuading Strangers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://primevector.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/persuading-strangers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://primevector.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/persuading-strangers/</link>
	<description>Adrian talks about his adventures and ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kartik Agaram</title>
		<link>http://primevector.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/persuading-strangers/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Kartik Agaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primevector.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-521</guid>
		<description>I like the way you phrase the question: how can I persuade strangers to contact me?

We met at SHDH late last year, I watched your lightning talk (on meditation, I think?), and I&#039;ve been following your blog ever since. So I&#039;m not sure if this counts as contact by a stranger :)

Studies have shown that for every 100 people that read something, 10 may write a throw-away sentence, and 1 person may actually be moved to create something more substantial in response. While such studies are usually in the context of websites rather than blogs by individuals, I think the pattern continues to hold: to get responses from non-friends you have to build something that rises above the chaff and grabs them. Getting strangers to contact you is isomorphic as a problem to building something people want. So keep iterating. Seek after feedback, but don&#039;t rely on it for social needs. That&#039;s what friends are for.

It&#039;s the flip side of &#039;release early, release often&#039;: as more and more people release early and often, the bar keeps going up on how &#039;fully baked&#039; something must be before people pay attention to it without social proof (because that&#039;s what attention from a stranger is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way you phrase the question: how can I persuade strangers to contact me?</p>
<p>We met at SHDH late last year, I watched your lightning talk (on meditation, I think?), and I&#8217;ve been following your blog ever since. So I&#8217;m not sure if this counts as contact by a stranger <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Studies have shown that for every 100 people that read something, 10 may write a throw-away sentence, and 1 person may actually be moved to create something more substantial in response. While such studies are usually in the context of websites rather than blogs by individuals, I think the pattern continues to hold: to get responses from non-friends you have to build something that rises above the chaff and grabs them. Getting strangers to contact you is isomorphic as a problem to building something people want. So keep iterating. Seek after feedback, but don&#8217;t rely on it for social needs. That&#8217;s what friends are for.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the flip side of &#8216;release early, release often&#8217;: as more and more people release early and often, the bar keeps going up on how &#8216;fully baked&#8217; something must be before people pay attention to it without social proof (because that&#8217;s what attention from a stranger is).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
