Comments on: The Rule of 162 (In support of agility) http://primevector.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/the-rule-of-162-in-support-of-agility/ Adrian talks about his adventures and ideas Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:39:17 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Why Companies are Doomed to Evil After 162 Employees « Primevector http://primevector.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/the-rule-of-162-in-support-of-agility/#comment-11 Why Companies are Doomed to Evil After 162 Employees « Primevector Thu, 03 May 2007 07:44:28 +0000 http://primevector.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/the-rule-of-162-in-support-of-agility/#comment-11 [...] are doomed to commit evil acts after they reach a certain size. I believe this critical size to be 162, but even if I’m wrong about the particular size, the same theory [...] [...] are doomed to commit evil acts after they reach a certain size. I believe this critical size to be 162, but even if I’m wrong about the particular size, the same theory [...]

]]> By: Jeff Lindsay http://primevector.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/the-rule-of-162-in-support-of-agility/#comment-5 Jeff Lindsay Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:01:32 +0000 http://primevector.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/the-rule-of-162-in-support-of-agility/#comment-5 You might be right about 162 over 150, but the difference between the two is less than 1% of either. Just curious, what makes you believe channel capacity is related to a geometric structure? You might be right about 162 over 150, but the difference between the two is less than 1% of either.

Just curious, what makes you believe channel capacity is related to a geometric structure?

]]>